** Ethereum: Complete analysis of replacement proposals
The Ethereum community actively studies ways to improve the scalability and usefulness of its basic blockchain and Ethereum technology. One of the most smokers is a replacement proposal (RBF), whose objective is to relieve high transaction rates related to the use of the current Ethereum network. In this article, we will present complete advantages and disadvantages of several RBF proposals, ensuring an objective analysis of its advantages and disadvantages.
Discussion of proposals replaced by words
Rate replacement (RBF) is a concept that proposes to exchange gas -based rates used in Ethereum with other rates structures. It is about reducing transaction costs and making them more available for a broader range of users. Currently, several RBF proposals are being developed or tested, each with their own set of benefits and defects.
1. Optimistic (optimistic)
The optimistic proposal (optimism) is one of the most promising RBF solutions. Use a decentralized and scalable architecture for the part of the transaction and optimization of your order in memory, reducing the number of gases required for each transaction. This approach allows:
- Reduced transaction rates
- Increased scalability
- Improved performance
However, some critics say that trusting the optimism of centralized authorities and their centralization potential are serious fears.
2. Arbitum
The referee is another popular RBF proposal developed by the Ethereum Foundation. It uses a similar architecture for optimism, but focuses on safety and stability. The main advantages of the referee include:
- Reduced transaction rates
- Improved security thanks to the use of layers in layers
- Increased scalability
However, some users expressed concerns about the potential of centralization and limited availability of arbitrary nodes.
3. ZK-ROLUP
ZK-ROLUP is a more experimental RBF proposal that uses zero knowledge evidence to allow faster and faster transactions. The main advantages of ZK-Rollup include:
- Reduced transaction rates
- Security was improved through evidence of zero knowledge
- Increased scalability
However, the development and implementation of ZK-Rollup is still at an early stage, and its long-term life remains uncertain.
4. Temple (also)
TEMPA is a blockchain network that has developed an RBF proposal called “replace through a rate” (RBF). The main advantages of RBF also include:
- Reduced transaction rates
- Improved security thanks to the use of an evidence consensus algorithm
- Increased scalability
However, some users aroused concerns about the potential of centralization and the limitations of current architecture.
5. Ethereum 2.0
Ethereum 2.0 is a new generation blockchain platform that promises to solve many problems with scalability and usability associated with its current network. Although it does not propose a direct RBF solution, it can eventually integrate some RBF functions with its architecture through future updates.
Pros and disadvantages: Comprehensive analysis
| PROPOSAL ADVANTAGES Disadvantages
| — | — | — |
| Optimistic Rolling (optimism) Reduced transaction rates, higher scalability centralized authorities, centralization potential
| Arbitrarum reduced transaction rates, better security limited availability of nodes
| Zk -rolp | Reduced transaction rates, better security through evidence of knowledge zero experimental architecture, long -term uncertain life
| Tense (also) rates reduced by transactions, better security through an algorithm of evidence of the stand centralized authorities, limitations of current architecture
| Ethereum 2.